>>4470674 lb
>>4470725 lb
steel is very weak at 1500 -1800 F
it "melts" at 2800F
but it turns to play dough long before then
*exact temp depends on alloy type but roughly the same +/- few hundred degrees
I stay away from the twin towers and focus in Building 7
fire was no way hot enough, and would not have caused a straight down even collapse. it would have toppled sideways
add in BBC calling it before it happened?
Bldg 7 total bs
just trying to be clear
many claim the temps were not high enough to effect the structure by quoting melting temps instead of operating temps
they might have been high enough to cause steel failure for the towers, but NOT building 7. the prob is anons start going round and round over DEWs and thermite etc and miss the bigger picture
the effect to focus on is how the buildings came straight down picture perfect into their own footprint without being done purposely
SDNY ?
not holding breath
UNLESS
some one has come along with more money or bigger blackmail than the opposition
I do not believe the gov version
the prob is many anons get caught up in the weeds and lose sight of the bigger picture.
misquoting or misunderstanding temp effects on steel leads to flawed theory or discredits otherwise legit questioning
it might have gotten hot enough in the towers, but would not happened to ALL of the columns at exactly the same instant to cause a straight no resistance fall.
building 7 simply has no explanation outside of human involvement