>>4470658
When steel loses a lot of strength, it does not lead to implosion.
It could lead to failure, but that's a very different thing.
Those 'missile airplanes' are scary!
>temps were not high enough to effect the structure by quoting melting temps instead of operating temps
of course the steel was damaged by the fire but not enough to collapse the big towers on its own.
Also, the damage caused by the plane impact was minimal on the perimeter steel. Not the way that facade was designed anyway. The spacing was very tight.
>how the buildings came straight down picture perfect into their own footprint without being done purposely
probably with lots of bombs
But yeah, # 7 is such a joke, it's almost embarrassing that they pulled it off.
^^^^^^
perfectly explained, anon
I'm jealous.
NEVER in the history of steel construction, has a skyscraper collapsed due to fire.
Except for that day.
3 buildings, two fires.
These pics make my blood BOIL.
Has the person in the pic been identified?
Is she really an EDNA?
Poor soul.
Yes, but there would be a $ amount attached to it.
Agreed that the Pentagon was probably the single most critical entity.
But… there was SOOO MUCH in the entire World Trade Center Complex, too.
>Mexico has really shitty cheap quality silver.
holy cow!
Silver doesn't care about its nationality.
If it's pure silver, it's pure silver.
Besides, the old school Mexican coins are beautiful.
especially the old silver libertads & the gold centenarios.
If he's going to put in another kike, and he will, he should call up Peter Schiff.