OK. What what are the odds that Q's numerical digits add up to 17 AND the interrogator's numerical digits adding up to 23 - and their cc's appear in the exact same slots?
OK. What what are the odds that Q's numerical digits add up to 17 AND the interrogator's numerical digits adding up to 23 - and their cc's appear in the exact same slots?
What is Q&A in a MIRROR?
Now do you understand why mirrors and disinformation is necessary?
Logical thinking.
[20]
Q
The c's are relegated to the two end slots in both ID's. The numerical characters occupy the first 4 slots in both IDs. So I believe it does make a difference. The c's very likely have special meaning as letter - both Q and potus use individual letter as code.
Anybody who has read all of Q's posts knows without a doubt that 17 and 23 are extremely significant - so much so that there is no question in most anon's minds.
Second the posts did not appear anywhere they appear in succession in the same thread. Experienced anons are also aware of the use of MIRRORS = Q&A A&Q
Now do you understand why mirrors and disinformation is necessary?
Logical thinking.
[20]
Q
It does matter very much. Maybe you have not read every Q post. Anyway. You are trying as hard as you can not to believe. You will not open your mind.
Do you understand that in a mirror things are seen to be reversed. Question is reversed with answer. Answer first, question second. This is very clear.
Now do you understand why mirrors and disinformation is necessary?
Logical thinking.
[20]
Q
Your argument is not with me; it is with Q when he asks, "what are the odds? How many times before mathematically impossible."
What are the odds of both IDs having cc on the end AND Q's digits adding up to 17 AND the questioner's digits adding up to 23? You also understand Q reversing thing's with mirrors, right?
It is Q who asks, "what are the odds? How many coincidences before mathematically impossible." Not me.
It is Q who says, "everything has meaning." Not me.
It is Q who says "THINK MIRROR." Not me.
Your argument is with Q. Not me.
Mathematical probability is not logic. You are a fucking retard. Yes, my argument is with you, retard.
Mathematical probability is not logic? You are a fucking retard. Yes, my argument is with you, retard.