>>4472276

Anon,

Should you happen upon a group of women, engaged in coordinated nudity in secret…

AVOID.

Greeks spoke of men being torn apart by "dogs", for chancing upon Artimis's rituals…

This was and is, in deed, FACT.

FACT: women lose bodily control upon orgasm.

"Witches" ab/use erotic power, and amplify it by engaging in synchronized movements.

And when this is disrupted, they immediately fall into a state of enraged, violent psychosis.

Women who are easily controlled by the power of Eros have limited capacity for reason; they are handled by informed persons as dogs are.

This is the origin of the term "bitch"–a woman controlled completely by pleasure/oxytocin, as dogs & other similar domesticated animals are.

THIS is the reason why Hillary Clinton drinks & is known to flip-out violently when "control" is lost: witches & others who ab/use "love magic" are all affected in the way described above.

"Loss of Control" snaps them out of their oxytocin-derived reverie, immediately spiking BP, requiring them to give/receive pain (which restores seratonin/oxytocin) to snap out of it.

"THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK"

This refers, yes, specifically to those affected by the above; however, it also applies to many women who are otherwise treated as normal or "suffering from a short-term mental illness", when they kill/abuse/torture those they "love".

>>4472466

Stated by Christ Himself (Matt. 23:15~).

However, "witch" is NOT inappropriate to use.

And its NOT inappropriate to be wary of them.

"The Power of Eros" belongs ONLY to Men, as our bodies are designed for it's proper use. A penis is VERY important for this, which is why "witches"–no matter how fucking "good" they are–will always work to create a pseudo-penis in their spirit/light bodies. The broom-stick is used, for example, to practice cock-driven body usage/movement techniques that THEY THEMSELVES discourage men from using.

Women BY NATURE are subversive.

This comes from relying on PROJECTION.

Without LOGIC, all you can do is PROJECT.

And so what you describe here, BUDDY, is just the difference between FUCKIN BRUJAS who either like or dont like you. If you on on their bad side (or simply have sth they they want), then all the shit you said about "Satanists" will definitely come tumbling out of Pandora's Box.

>>4472505

>>4472393

More useful, instead, to ask yourself:

1) Why do shills keep it up?

2) How do they affect you, physiologically?

3) What IS this physiological reaction–simple "arousal" or is it the generation of "anti-gravity"

4) What exactly about boobs allows them to be the center of this effect–matter that appears solid, but in a state of perpetual collapse, creating an aetherial vacuum effect as result?

5) What happens when YOUR OWN DIVINE POWERS are controlled by sth external to you

[

Re-read Genesis: "Fallen Man" is defined by God, as any dipshit whose "desire" is external to him, manifesting usually as a "wife" (ala Job)

]

>>4472556

Remember Q:

"These people are SICK!"

This is meant in the literal sense.

The same thing that drives pedos & satanists, also affects those men in the US addicted to pain killers; "love" is truly some insidious shit.