>>447578

Is there a person we could identify as T, who would be discorporated 12:34 before or after that crumb? (I say before because, for a while, i held a theory that numbers in brackets were negative, like in accounting entries.)

>>447640

I think it has to be slow enough that they can run their simulation models often and deeply, always confirming the next step in the plan is ready for execution before doing it.

>>447777

>>447775

Yes interesting.

I don't see any red flags that would inauthenticate it right off the bat.

No idea if it is in the format and style

that the FBI would use.

No idea why an "Evidence Response Team"

would include a "Crisis Management Specialist".

Maybe that job category description can be found online?

It looks like a photocopy of something typewritten on a printed form.

Anon could look up that address + date, and possibly the FBI people's names.

I can't - hitting the sack.

I don't think "Crisis Management Specialist" in an "Evidence Response Team" would equate to a "crisis actor".

But prove me wrong . . .

night night all