>>4476870

First LOVE the picture.

Second, WHY the shitty quality on these???

>>4477238

It was meant to lead to thoughts.

I know, Anon.

I think we've all been thinking it.

>>4477256

I didn't go check Twat, just noticed all I'd seen (save one of her alone signing), were incredibly low quality.

>>4477245

AHAHAHAHA. He tried. He tried.

>>4477178

Definitely.

Sorry….I love an artfully done sleeve and she's not totally covered.

Lovely. Cute as hell too.