again pushing this shitโฆ
GTFO faggot.
they are not paid to bring links, or full articles.
btw israeli fake news msm = all other global fake news msm. Haaretz is a hebrew soros mouthpiece, a progressive garbage propaganda piece.
CNN is not controlled oposition, 99% of global media are anti israeli shills.
Has a lot to do with muslim brotherhood and oil money connections.
btw many from the other side (alt media) are pro israeli shills, but that is a different story. The alt media is 1% of the global media market.
this is what kills their narrative: see attached.
Mattis in the same category as Adm. Rogers. Controlled resignations designed probably to work behind the scenes on the preparations for the trials etc.
what is certain and not probable is that mattis is in the same category as Rogers, i.e. a good guy who resigned to do big stuff behind the scenes.
The only speculation is regarding what he does behind the scenes.
to add even more: here is the pattern imo
the pattern:
intel
law
MIL
my speculation:
Rogers resigned first cause he needed to prepare and testify from the intel perspective, in the ongoing investigations of that time.
Sessions finished supervising the investigations (Huber + 2nd investigation that q hinted). No need to stay because his role was over. Now they need an AG that specializes as a hardcore prosecutor.
speculation - Sessions might be involved in writing the supreme court requests, asking for the right to oganize military tribunals for our cabal actors who will be accused in treason ("enemy combatants).
mattis and kelly resigned because they need to prepare the infrastructure for the military trial/gitmo detention procedures. Plus they might be needed as witnesses.
Just my analysis, but the existance of a clear resignation pattern is a fact.
I agree. But the fact that they are lumped, means that '''if one is a blackhat. they all are black hats.
But given that Adm. Rogers is a whitehat =all others are whitehats'''
Logical thinking + occams' razor.
If you wish to apply the "dissinfo is necessary" line, than absolutley everything that q says that haven't actually happened, is a speculation.
Imo in the "resignation pattern" crumb q was definitive. The goal of the crumb was to help us paint the picture. think logically, had he want to use disinfo, Q could just remain silent about Mattis, no need to tell us anything. But he did tell us, something that is pretty definitve. Also note the shill craziness going on around this, they are giving 100% to convince us that Mattis is compd "look at muh purple tieโฆ"
These are more than enough to convince me that q asn't using disinfo here.
On the other hand, the Mueller = RR crumb, was vague, it doesnt tell us that they are good or that they are bad. It simply says they are working together. This has the potential for being disinfo as this crumb could mean they are both cabal agents, or double agents (working for the whitehats).
this is certain. But until now, q left all those questionable people up for speculation, while confirming those that the blackhats already knew were good guys, as whitehats.
No, I just think that not all comms are disinfo, unlike you.
Occams' razor wasn't posted by him for nothing.