>>4483716 pb

Ok, you are seeing patterns that are meaningful. But at this point, looks like they are mainly meaningful to you.

If you want them to be meaningful to others, you have to find the right audience and to think about how to explain the info in a way that makes sense to them. Mostly, you have to make it easy to see AT A GLANCE. Because on a board like that, that's often all the time you get.

This place is great for news and connecting things people already know about (like stuff in Q posts). But not for deep explorations into unfamiliar areas.

>>4483760

The word "marginal" is interesting, as well. Who says that word to a 7 year old?

some meanings:

a. at the edge of a page (in the margins)

b. not of central importance

c. in the borderlands of a stable territory

d. excluded from the mainstream of society

e. located at the fringe of consciousness

f. barely acceptable/qualitied/functional

Re: Linked-In Reid Hoffman's fake apology to FB & Jonathon Morgan's claim that he acted alone

Hoffman's apology is fake in that he only said he was sorry after he got caught giving $100,000 to the New Knowlege "experiment" to see the effect of simulated "Russian bots " on the outcome of Alabama election.

There's an ongoing digg on New Knowledge. Everyone involved in this project looks shady. All DEM operatives. This "experiment" seems like election fraud to me; they're getting off lightly if the only thing that happens is getting banned from FB.

One especially interesting statement by New Knowledge CEO Jonathon Morgan. In the The Verge article, Morgan said he was "acting alone as a researcher and not through New Knowledge."

https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/26/18156702/reid-hoffman-backed-group-alabama-election-misinformation-roy-moore

Really?

Because in the original NYT article, the project is described in an "internal report." That would be a report that comes from within New Knowledge, wouldn't it?

The report said that "We orchestrated and elaborate 'false flag' operation." Who is "WE," if the CEO acted alone?

Makes me wonder.

First, why would the CEO say he was acting alone? Is there some important reason that he has for wanting to distance New Knowledge from this scandal?

Second, what does this internal report actually say about the "experiment"? Who wrote it? Who was involved? Where can the public get a copy of this report to see exactly what it says (rather than having to trust the NYT to tell us what it says)?

>>4484028

Druids, huh? The MSM says we're into the "reptilians rule the earth" paradigm–saw it in at least 2 articles, and I wasn't even looking…Not to malign David Icke, but I don't think Q has commented on reptilians just yet….

But at least the MSM are openly hostile; we know what they're about. It's always harder getting shafted by people who claimed to be your allies ("muh weed").

>>4484053

"Extra-super-important-notables."

Don't tell me there's something even grander and more unattainable to which anons can aspire….Kek!

>>4484053

The system isn't perfect but works reasonably well–and anything better would be wrecked by shills, just as you suggest.

>>4484063

Living in a world where we have to have money to live–and money that's manipulated by bankers, etc–introduces all sorts of moral dilemmas around money issues.

Yes, people can get corrupted because of it. At the same time, EVERYBODY has got to have it, and in the modern world, quite a lot of it. Just to live decently.

Journalists get paid for their work, just like other people. I don't have a problem with that. Don't have a problem with freelancers reporting on patriot issues wanting to make a living if they are spending all their time on this. Free enterprise, it's good.

I also spend all my time on this, but that's because I have that time by the grace of God. Not all others do.

There are always going to be jerks that are exploitative in their money-making. And then there are those who are worse, who will cross red lines in their pursuit of their aims.

We each have to decide what's ok in our book regarding this sort of thing. I'm not hyper-concerned about small mistakes, people aren't angels. At the same time, red lines are red lines. Good to talk about where those lines are and when we think they are being crossed.

But evidence is critical. A lot of shit gets slung around here, and many of those who sling it offer little sauce to back up their claims. I'll always listen to those with sauce; your comments are thoughtful.

>>4484064

Well-said, anon.

suggest

notable

>>4483808

I don't know anything about kratom but I do know that the FDA makes periodic attempts to demonize natural products such a herbs and vitamins, when they think the public are getting too far off the reservation re pharamaceutical drugs. Early 90s they went after a lot of herbal/vitamins suppliers, raiding places, etc. Pushback from the people stopped them then, hope it stops them now, if that's what they're up to.

>>4484105

We have one of those signs at Kaiser piously announcing no guns. I feel so safe.

>4484083

I hope they get to sleep on the plane.

>>4484162

There are opinions and opinions. Most are average but every once and a while, they are outstanding. Diverse population here; you never know who's talking.

>>4484176

I didn't think most people would agree, I just happen to like well-reasoned "what-if" opinions. They do show up in notables at times, just depends who's here and what they think.

>>4484260

Fox is a mixed bag, but with discrimination, it's possible to get something from their coverage. Nobody is going to give you 100% truth (or anything close to it) but there are nuggets here and there.

>>4484251

you mean legit in the sense of being sauced?

>>4484299

I get a lot but often it's from searching the archive. If I search on a topic, I can draw from months of discussion about it. Different articles, different anons, different stories. Put them together and you start getting a picture. Sometimes!

>>4484328

>The obvious shills are largely here to make the non obvious shills more invisible

That seems plausible.

>>4484351

You're right, anon, especially when it's POTUS.

>>4484324

>>4484357

Dr. Dean Lorich, 54, was found dead on Sunday afternoon, Dec. 10, with a knife in his chest. There was no sign of forcible entry to his Park Avenue apartment in Manhattan and police sources told the New York Post that it appeared Lorich killed himself.

But why? Lorich was a successful orthopedic surgeon, married, father of three girls. His 11-year-old daughter found him face-up on the bathroom floor, but there was no suicide note.

“He was under some personal stress,” a police source told the New York Daily News.

….

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mystery-death-celebrity-surgeon-found-with-knife-in-chest-in-his-manhattan-apartment_2384942.html

>>4484416

Wow, anon….

>>4484438

Yes, it's a great template. But your memes are like five shots dead-center.

>>4484452

Even if you didn't make them, you put them together. Great combo.

>>4484453

I could laugh all night….

>>4484471

Wicked…with that, I think I'll have to turn in. The end of the road. G'night, have fun!