>But not for deep explorations into unfamiliar areas.
And why is that?
>>4483626 (lb)
>ks drop
>explain why its valuable to Q Research.
1- Because according to Q #19 on Oct 31, 2017, someone as yet unknown had already exposed the pedo network in H wood.
2 - Newsweek published a strange article last month relating the 'Q Anon Movement' to Spacey. There was much confusion at the time as to why they would do that. This theory could help to fill in some blanks.
https://www.newsweek.com/what-q-anon-movement-and-it-related-kevin-spacey-1222548
>>4483158 (lb)
Regardless of whether certain individuals choose to 'see' it or not, there's multiple cipher allusions in the crumbs, from ROT to Beale to Atbash.
Seems to be enough interest to make a dedicated thread around it. Think that very little productive work could be accomplished in the general breads given the nature of the tasks and the environment that is the general.
http://decipherdemon.com/rot.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beale_ciphers
https://mysteriouswritings.com/the-atbash-cipher-and-jeremiah-511/
Didn't say anything about it being a notable or not. Someone asked for relevance to Q research and evidence was provided.
That 'just an opinion' is already out in the wild attracting attention anyhow, so our subjective arguments of what and what is not notable is functionally irrelevant in this case, as its already bypassed the 'notables' filter like it or not.
If you have an alternate interpretation on the video that is also supported by fact-based evidence and are willing to share it, then i am willing to make the same argument on its behalf as to its revelance to Q research if anyone challenges it.
Very rarely nominate anything for a notable these days, so afraid probably can't help you there.
Have always thought him myself too
>will laugh once disclose details
but maybe there's more than one?
One or more to expose what's going on and one or more rats from inside the belly of the beast?