>>4484118

>Is there anything new here?

>>4484072

I don't do YouTubers, so I've never heard of this guy - Law Johnston.

He's taking theories from here and stating them as truth. Ending the FED, martial law about to be imposed, GHWB found guilty of treason for murdering JFK and executed by lethal injection… All of this part of the Special Operation called Q. blah, blah, blah

This is the dangerous crap that paint us as conspiracy theorists. While I'm open to any or all of that, when there is no solid proof to show it only undermines this movement. That's my 2 cents.

>>4484242

>I see this place as a casual conversation about a handful of related topics.

In my mind, this place has been like a committee doing a brainstorming session. Everyone throws out their ideas, even the crappy ones, then we get down to the most valid to work on.

>>4484227

I've got a little problem with this. Was he recording before he was groped? Or did he let the groping go on long enough to get it recorded? I just picture myself in that scenario, and if I'm being groped against my will, I'm gonna pull away, not let it continue while I record it. I don't know. Just seems fishy.

>>4484267

Your assessment isn't necessarily wrong as to the current state of this board, but in the beginning it was pure awesomeness with all the research going on and being shared here.

>>4484372

It looks funny, but you've got to put both name fields together. Possible Human Trafficking Victim. There wasn't enough room in one field.

>>4484391

Fake and gay. Here' what's at the bottom of this June 23 article:

[ Correction (Posted June 23): The original version of this story misstated what happened to former CIA Director John Brennan. He was not arrested Saturday and is not nor has he ever been a suspect in an international child trafficking investigation.

We regret and apologize for the false story that appeared on our website, and are investigating how incorrect information was in our system and how and why it was allowed to be published.

We apologize to our audience and to Mr. Brennan. There simply is no excuse for this sort of mistake. ]

>>4484401

Ding, ding, ding.

That is the part that has kept me from getting my hopes up that this EO will affect the DS actors we all want to see brought to justice.

>>4484436

>I've certainly been on less productive committees.

So have I. And to me it seems that the larger the committee, the more BS you have to filter through. So with up to 200 people posting on here, and only a handful are actually hard-working anons, it gives the impression that nothing gets done. But anons know.

>>4484468

I'm sure they have. Some of us have, and those two are much closer to the action than we are.