== Populism >Reframe As Hate Speech/Radicalization >> Ban ==
Problem:
The rise of populist voices and susequent decline of state-led MSM narratives
How to "solve" the "problems" of free speech and democratic choice?
Solution:
Deal with garden-variety dissent via existing anti-terror programs and platform-level controls
Frame such popular dissent as "hate speech," a precursor to radicalization and terrorist activity
Recent actions by social media platforms and payment networks are suspicious
They've made their actions appear as an emergent response, rather than a planned attack
But they are suspicious because they've been so well coordinated
Now even avowed liberal and Thiel Capital Managing Director Eric Weinstein is asking questions:
1/ The Christmas Thread. First off, Merry Xmas to all. I’m asking for your help. I want to know whether any of you know about any quiet working groups or meetings involving but not limited to Visa/MC/PayPal/etc working on the issues of “populism”/“radicalization” as euphemisms.
2/ This would be organized by by some group like CFR, NAS or some other blue chip institution. It would be looking to figure out how to handle the “problems” of popular nullification of institutional objectives. In short it would view Brexit, Trump and restrictionism as “hate”.
3/ This quiet meeting would bring together the major “stakeholders”(?) which would not include the public. The twin problems the meeting would actually be trying to solve are “free speech” and “democratic choice” which the public generally doesn’t want solved at all.
4/ The meeting would explore the question of how to use the existing anti-terror programs & platform level controls to handle garden variety dissent contributing to popular nullification as if it were “hate speech”, which it would claim was akin to, or a gateway for, terror.
5/ I’m not asking b/c I have any information that such a meeting occurred. I, in fact, have NO such information. However, I am well aware of how coordinated action has been made to look more “emergent”, in the past & I now think we’re at a very dangerous juncture between 2018-20.
6/ This all now looks way off to me. Patreon is just the window through which we are glimpsing it. Why? Because they‘re clumsy. I fear we‘re seeing some plan to reestablish the former power of the Gated Institutional Narrative well above Patreon’s paygrade using payment networks.
7/ I hope this is wrong. But if it‘s correct, “improper” bitcoin transactions will start to carry serious criminal penalties. Further @jordanbpeterson will not deliver a technological fix as indicated. Watch @datasociety, @nytimes coverage & payment channels. Happy Holidays.
https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751816400433152