>>4491306 lb
More will come, but this must be digested and processed.
And now for something completely different (and completely NOT different): ant colonies.
>>4491306 lb
More will come, but this must be digested and processed.
And now for something completely different (and completely NOT different): ant colonies.
100% correct, taken the right way.
Only shills have canned responses to these kinds of posts.
No: 100% certainty that nothing about Q is 100% confirmed or denied.
Unfortunately, only the Deep State and Cabal could let Orwell come to prominence. Who owned the publishers and radio stations.
Get woke. Dominionists are compelled to relate what they have done, what they are doing, and what they will do to their victims. "Popular Art" is their usual tool for doing so.
"Animal Farm:" capitalists are MORE EQUAL than others… literally in the legal code.
Capitalism is same as communism: oligarchy. Try free enterprise for once.
Severe bewb shortage.
Yes. Revolution, not by the people, is NOT a revolution, for, by and of the people. Q represents the exact opposite of the spirit of the declaration of independence and constitution (exp. bill of rights).
That said…. necessary evils, pragmatically, exist.
That said, goodness and common good are "greedy algorithms." So, where does that leave us with Q?
"truths to be self-evident"
Ok. I'll speak plainly: there has never been anything–on a state or national level–that has NOT been a matter of private and public collusion, on behalf of the same small group of wealthy individuals (formerly "royal" bloodlines).
The "darlings" of American capitalism did not happen without government collusion.
Unfortunately, Q has proven that Q is colluding with Trump.
There is a little circumstantial evidence that Q & TRump are colluding on behalf of "the people."
Posting on 8ch.net alone proves nothing.
Your problem is in assuming the CJIS/FBI/DA's aren't "the people's" enemy. Their primary directive for decades has been to disarm the people. Blaming "illegals" is there latest gimmick.
No bewbs, no street cred.
People need to be more rational:
I said "a little circumstantial evidence" pro-Q.
I said nothing con-Q.
You're grinding metal on metal.
You disregard Trump's interacting with Q.
Best YOU can say is that Q is inside Twit/WH comm's team and Trump is playing along, havind discovered it.
You know, given Q and Q researchers and Q Friendly indep journo's revelations, PAIN is the least of our concerns, and has already happened.
I don't care. I win no matter what.
Hell, I liked your post!