>>4492467, >>4492448
Kek. Thanks baker, appreciate you fixing those.
>>4492522
>I agree
Ty anon
>some bakers can't stop themselves from inserting their opinions
Opinions are one thing, but implying factual crimes to an individual is to make an allegation. When the accused is a public figure, this borders on illegal – to commit the offense of slander or defamation. False accusations should never be made in notables.
I've noticed that things shills will push particular slides for a few days and then MSM coincidentally follow with QAnon-discrediting stories referencing those slides as being generated by us. A big one during the Calif. fires was the DEW/HighSpeedRailsMaps slide (see pics). We've been avoiding some of their latest attempts (the Kevin Spacey connects, for example) but they're also trying to renew rando Pizzagate "pedo" interest, to see if we'll put gay&fake shit in notes. Then they can reference it later to call us conspiracy nut Q'tards.
We can't stop what they write about us, but we can control what we put in notables. Newbs will come here to investigate for themselves. The less they see to corroborate MSM's fake&gay narrative about us the better.
Thanks for baking for us!
WWG1WGA