>>4496921 ANON DECODE POTUS TWEET 'STORM IS UPON US'

>>4496921

NOTABLE

>>4496996

you are correct

>>4496964

Notable

>>4497153

click the No.press return

type==

type notable

type== again

(make sure it is on a line by itself)>>4497153

click reply

grow some nuts.

Some of these bakers are comped.

>>4497160

Put it in again, it won't be the first time a notable has been repeated. Save us all the headache.

>>4497258

you mean you

just because a bunch of faggots notable something inorganically, doesn't mean it's notable

knew you'd all try again, anons have already weighed in

good thing I lurked moar

Break that down for me exactly, 'inorganic'. I don't want to assume anything.

>>4497541

Is that you Daniel Defoe? You could have stopped it all by responding in a civil way. I was not the only one calling it a notable. Was it not a notable?

Your copy pasta is getting tiresome. Notables speak for themselves. And just a little reminder for those notables that a little questionable,

Notables

are not endorsements

It's better to spend a few zeros and ones than to let something good (that you don't get) go by.

Many come here and do not have the time to lurk. Notables are usually 3 days ahead of the MSM. That alone wakes a lot of normies up.

THERE ARE NO PENALTIES FOR DUPS IN THE NOTABLES

So instead of creating all this drama, shut up and bake.