So uh…do you guys think Youtube might have some bias? Just checked and both times…
Third one upsets me in a big way. They did the same shit so many times. I seriously wish some random act of Zeus would happen and obliterate them all because the more one thinks about it the more they begin to realize how many conflicts, deaths, murders, rapes and other horrible things are a direct result of their fake news.
You think that's bad? Just wait because this is now the current case of precedent and it falls in the Ninth.
https://8ch.net/pol/res/12610407.html
It absolutely infuriates me that the Jewish community comes down on the POTUS. He is the first world leader to recognize Jerusalem and he has given them so much. I was always on the fence with them/never talked about them in any way, never the "blame the jew" and in fact defended them several times over both online and off over various shit they had nothing to do with.
However, lately they let China own their port thus blocking us, they have the nerve to complain that our troops were coming home to their families and worse yet they turned on the only person in history who recognized that city as theirs. It has been a total spit in the face from Israel this past month again and again.
Don't know what to tell you anon, works fine here. Are you in Europe? If so it's probably that due to the EU censorship. But just go to /pol/ on 8chan and it's the top post at moment titled "IMPORTANT: hate speech precedent set"
Here I will just pasta it:
"Black student leader sued her racist online harassers and wins groundbreaking settlement
The student leader sued Evan James McCarty of Eugene, Ore., and two other defendants, including the publisher of the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer, after she was pummeled with racist pictures and derogatory messages online. As part of the settlement, filed this past week, McCarty said he will apologize, repudiate white supremacy, go to counseling and join forces with civil rights organizations to help them fight hatred and racism, according to The New York Times.
Dumpson, 22, told the newspaper that this should serve as a warning to racists who hide behind the cover of the Internet or the shield of night to do their cowardly deeds, “that they’re going to be held accountable.”
“I’m using what was a traumatic experience for me to help promote racial justice,”
In the lawsuit, Dumpson said she feared for her life and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
One of the people eager to join in was McCarty, also now 22, a student and actor who had been leading a clandestine life on the Internet, posting racist messages under the alias “Byron De La Vandal,” a nod to Byron De La Beckwith of the Ku Klux Klan who killed Medgar Evers. McCarty’s true identity was unveiled by an anti-fascist group in April.
As part of the settlement, McCarty agreed to assist Dumpson as she sued his two co-defendants, Anglin and Brian Andrew Ade. McCarty must also apologize to Dumpson in writing and on video, which she can then use for “civil rights advocacy, outreach and educational activities,” according to the settlement.
McCarty also agreed to undergo anti-hate training and at least one year of counseling, complete four academic classes on race and gender issues and perform 200 hours of community service related to racial justice. Dumpson’s legal team will monitor his compliance and will hit him with monetary penalties if he fails to comply, according to The Times.
“What we are doing here is pulling back the veil on online racist trolls,” said Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which filed the lawsuit on Ms. Dumpson’s behalf, according to The NY Times. “For too long, they’ve been allowed to act with impunity.”
This is big actually and they did this very covertly. The First and Second are all that is keeping us from killing each other right now in terms of politics. If they take either it will very likely be on very quick like so it's somethng to keep an eye on.
Oh I don't agree with that anon. I respect the rule of law and would never break it but if the country broke down and conflict started there would be many crosses aligning the highway with them nailed on it for all the shit they have caused for destroying the country.
Of course the difference is we follow the law while they break it but that would change if they truly did cause conflict.
I agree it was weird and made me walk away thinking it would be so easy for them to set up false flags like that just to chip away at the First Amendment.
This is very notable