Q has told us a half a dozen times or so since late '17 that 2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS

What is the take of the highest IQ Anons?

Has:

a) 2018 has been glorious

b) Not yet, but the next few days will be amaze-balls

c) Timing changes

d) Disinfo is necessary

e) 2018 was secretly glorious, will be revealed in future proves past

Is there any consensus amongst your glorious bastards how to think about it? I'm definitely not option a, but looking for hope.

>>4499475

I am glad for you. I just got noticed that my job is being synergized. not glorious.

>>4499491

NK is certainly promising, but not yet delivered. Syria is still a waezone/shithole, but at least our boys are getting out (although to Iraq /Afghan rather than home). Pulling out of the paris accord should be a given, certainly glad of it, but short of glorious. Unemplyment is good…maganomics beginning to bear fruit, but just starting to. I have to admit, if late 2017 when Q first said 2018 will be glorious, he meant in 2018 we'd have some whitewashed and scrubbed down horowitz reports, nothing but future hope from Huber, some reisgnations and retirements from the swamp,but none of them in jail for their crimes, and hope, but not proof of a serious Clinton investigation, but not even seriously starting the process of 'LOCK HER UP!' chants at rallies….I would not have called that glorious. Slow progress, perhaps, but not glorious.

>>4499817

We're about halfway through GEOTUS's term. The swamp is no where close to half drained, it may even be swampier than when he was elected due to radicalization of the resist movement in the bureaucracy. The wall is not built, but at least he is fighting for a small part of it. She isn't locked up, nor even publicly indicted, arrested or charged, and quite frankly, won't be. She will die of old age before doing time.

Drain the swamp.

Build the wall

Lock her up.

POTUS is oh-fer at halftime. And if he is oh-fer when he is running again, he will lose, even with no fraud.