Serious question and not trying to be a dick but why is a local - or even regional - news anchor dying of OD notable?

>>4499561

Starting to seem that way, yes.

Its getting to where its not even a decent news aggregation resource anymore, with all the extremely sketch media sites being linked with no supporting sauce via dig or additional sources just because it satisfied someones confirmation bias as well.

>>4499635

>>4499561

Seriously need to get back to notables requiring nomination ‘as’ notable be from 2 or more anons and self-nomination being completely ignored.

Badly.

>>4499757

No because they can be refuted as well.

Was a time when some notables were ‘hotly’ debated - and if/when those contentious ones are added, they got added with a disclaimer

>>4499776

You think so?

I honestly think it will get worse - much harder to discern truth (or what someone honestly believes anyway) from misdirection and disinfo.

At that stage, misingo and subversion will be the ‘only’ weapons they have left

>>4499768

Go fuck yourself.

Batant and glowing shill attempt.

>>4499748

>>4499464

>QUALITY

It ‘would’ be quality if not for the subconscious need to simultaneously virtual-signal and pander to confirmation bias.

‘I am a trans… he liked that…’

Its total bullshit. Be better anon, its a shill that couldnt help himself (itself?)