i hate to say it on one hand, but on the other I'll say it: choosing between the Phillips curve clergy and the Moneterism of Friedman makes me feel like Stan Marsh having to choose between a turd sandwich and shit taco.
I am so excited to see everyone enthused about the immenent end of the fed. I just want to point out, getting the pendulum to mean reversion via monetarist policies only does just the moves the pendelum. There was economics before the great depression ,nowadays we just call it Microeconomics. But from now going before the celeb econs influencing our modern ideas there was an underlying a debate which the two sides keynes and Friedman embodied: "the illusion of money". simply two sides: A sez: money matters in terms of Real (not face value) purchasing power. B sez: people plan in terms of denominal value rather than Real change in prices over time. Food for thought in case LdR or another bankerfag wants to pupil the anons in here.
sauce: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_illusio