>>4501598 (previous bread)
"columnist Jamal Khashoggi" is an expert commentator on all that arms supply stuff. After all he was an arms trafficker himself and nephew of Adnan Khashoggi, the notorious worldwide arms trafficker and general scumbucket.
if tshtf, you'll probably want something you can spend, in reasonable amounts (silver) not vast sums all at once (gold)
and fundamentally silver is quite scarce.
I am not a gold bug nor silver bug and am not accumulating precious metal. But if I were doing so, that's an argument for silver.
OK then I'll say it more clearly, to save you the trouble of being my science book because I don't need one: you're either ignorant or lying.
and what's wrong with them? They're pretty close to the 10 Commandments, a bit less strict but no contradictions there. You can choose the 10 Commandments instead if you like them better. They're just the version Noah was given before Moses.
Well I guess I am done unless he makes some other snide remark.
Think of an Orthodox community. Very insular. You have to go there or watch a podcast or something to know much about them. They are not imposing "judeo-christian values" on anyone, they are more or less pretending that the rest of the world doesn't exist.
I dunno, it's complicated to understand exactly how a Mexican owned newspaper would choose to cover that story.
With Zionists, the Palestinians and other barbarians lose. Does that include you? If so, sorry.
How significant is the veil? I mean in traditional US weddings, the bride wears a veil until the kiss.
If you're buying it to trade, normally you won't take physical possession. If you're betting the physical metal will command a premium when exchanges collapse due to insufficient supply (a form of tshtf based on a real situation) then you have to pay a transaction cost now of a few percent perhaps, obtain and store your physical metal.
Yeah I don't want to watch it.
I do want the perpetrators to suffer the same fate in public, though.
Tough talk there, Lindsey. Mulvaney already said the Dems are willing to provide 1.3 billion in wall money but it's not enough for Trump.