>>5161009

>>5160867

>potential of a properly scaled bitcoin system

Another decentralized blockchain project has already addressed BTC limitations -5 years old, 200k nodes, on-chain scaling (no lightning network needed), smart contract capability, 15 second block times, 5 proof-of-work algorithms resistant to 51% attacks.

We just can't keep saying DLT is fundamentally limited because BTC is limited. There are other projects out there. We just need to dig moar

>>5204721

random search words much? say goodbye to 2FA, passwords, hackers stealing data etc. All soon to be things of the past

>>5221687

>It's funny that you think what goes up must go down when shuttle launches prove otherwise.

Not supporting d5955f, but you might want to revise your statement.