>>4535584
>http://0ye0gncqg772o.com/
Agree with my fren here. While Jesus spoke in parables–this dude is NOT Jesus (and mixing metaphors is NOT using relatable, relevant parables!). Q warns us of deceiving messages and "…their use of symbols will be their downfall…".
So–to speak CLEARLY, here is what I see coming:
-
Trump will rightly blame the FED for the economic chaos ensuing from the CRASH
NOTE: While like the anon above says, I too struggle a bit with the whole "civil unrest" outcome from my earlier post on a potential blueprint for market-meltdown. But–if the financial storm is not SEVERE–how does POTUS ensure he has everyone's attention. How better to achieve that, than to simply allow the natural course of financial destruction (complete with the ensuing runs on banks, gas stations, grocery stores, et. all with civil unrest)? Only in this light, does it possibly fit within the "we-are-in-full-control" narrative from Q.
-
Trump demands a FULL AUDIT of the FED
-
Coupled with the full financial meltdown (and possible civil unrest), the results of the audit depict the true and accurate picture of a century of financial corruption–THE FED DIES
-
Trump restructures the FED, most probably making it truly federal and controlled by the Senate (with new safeguards that smarter minds than ours come up with) and harmonizing with Q's "structure" comment on the FED
-
Trump then introduces a new-and-approved, gold-backed currency fulfilling his campaign promise of making the dollar strong again–and harmonizing with Q's "Gold shall destroy FED"
-
Inherent in this potential scenario is the fact that precious metals will need to be protected for a period of time from price manipulation. The current House Bill on the table (from memory) allows 30 or 60 days for this process to occur. Regardless–the long-suppressed price must find its true level on a free market
This is how the new USD will be "strong", because it will be worth a fraction (TBD) of the new, un-suppressed price of gold. So, if Gold were to be valued on the free market at $10k per ounce (speculation for this proposition), then a new $100 bill would be worth 1/100th of an ounce of gold.
If we assume Q's answer "yes" to the question "Do we have the gold?" means (somehow) we have a LOT of gold (maybe a good portion still in the ground–via Bix Wier's Grand Canyon premise roadtoroota.com), then we could retire our national debt overnight, given the new, high price per ounce of gold.
Nobody has really ventured into this area yet–but what if President Trump's plan also included ELIMINATING INCOME TAX?
That is a bread in and of itself–but prior to income tax (passed the same year by the traitorous FDR and criminal politicians as the FED Act), the government was funded largely on tariffs, along with a sales tax on a few items domestically (whiskey I think was one).
I believe cryptos play a role–but not sure how and when. Steve Bannon's POV as cryptos enabling humanity to circumvent the banks rings true in my spirit. And I do see and acknowledge all of the potential down sides too (like it may have been the cabal's creation in the first place–per 1980 Economist mag cover…).
Regardless–BIG CHANGE IS COMING. I pray for wisdom and prepare for a time of chaos surrounding the transition.
WWG1WGA!