Anonymous ID: 00d1e4 Dec. 28, 2018, 4:52 p.m. No.4506566   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Reminder:

 

We don't have to convince people Q is legit.

 

The topics discussed here and the dots connected here are what's important. We have to expose evil, crime, and deception. Create the demand for truth, transparency, justice, and action.

 

Future proves past. The reality of Q's role will be apparent in time, but it's trivial. The substance is what's important, not the person. Q provides some direction. "He" is not the destination.

Anonymous ID: 00d1e4 Dec. 28, 2018, 4:58 p.m. No.4506672   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6796

>>4506584

I understand Q's occasional frustration with people who don't understand why they need more than two years to unravel, expose, and prosecute a cabal with 7 or 8 figure membership numbers and decades, if not centuries of crimes, and influence in nearly every major government, industry, field of study, etc. or people who don't understand why Q can't reveal a timeline or specific plans, or simply divulge all the juicy stuff.

 

But ultimately, you're right. It doesn't really matter. The objective is to send a message to "them," communicate openly, leave breadcrumbs for use in hindsight, galvanize a supportive base, motivate citizen research, maximize exposure of evil/crimes/deception, etc. Not win "believers."

Anonymous ID: 00d1e4 Dec. 28, 2018, 5:03 p.m. No.4506751   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4506622

It only makes sense that the church would be a massive target by the opposition to infiltrate. I don't know enough about Billy Graham to condemn him, personally, but there is certainly darkness lurking among "Big Christianity."

Anonymous ID: 00d1e4 Dec. 28, 2018, 5:11 p.m. No.4506875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6933 >>6981

>>4506796

Agreed completely. I just don't think it's necessarily Q's responsibility or role to disclose. He's laying the foundation of interest/creating demand. Disclosure should come through official channels, right?

Anonymous ID: 00d1e4 Dec. 28, 2018, 5:14 p.m. No.4506923   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4506886

I won't post it again. I didn't realize it had been discussed already. It's obviously unsourced and "out there" with its claims, so I see where you're coming from.