I don't have enough information to outright accuse Pence of anything. But I do think it's worth considering that anti-Cabalist JFK had LBJ (obviously comped) as his VP. Reagan, who at least started as an outsider, at HW (obviously comped) as his VP.

JFK was assassinated. Reagan had attempts against him. "They" seemed okay with the VP choice. The pattern seems to be allowing someone "out of the club" on the condition of an insider as VP, and then going for wetwork if they won't cooperate.

All this talk about removing Trump or worse seems to indicate an acceptance of Pence by the cabal. And the pattern seems to indicate it's necessary for an outsider to have one of "them" on the ticket.

It would almost be MORE surprising if Pence wasn't comped.

>>4507348

My money with AB is that he is in witness protection, or some other form of protective custody. I suspect something similar for Chester Bennington and Chris Cornell, and an outside chance of the same with Prince.

Can anyone find the opening clip to Trevor Moore's comedy special High in Church?

It depicts a "comedic" depiction of Trevor Moore being informed about the illuminati and being invited (under threats of declining) to join as a requirement for having a stand-up special on Comedy Central.

It's really surreal to watch it now, because it was years and years ago, but so accurate to what's been uncovered since then. They "jokingly" explain how the illuminati function, disclose secrets/conspiracies, require him to tape himself molesting a child for blackmail, require him to subtley push their agenda through comedy, etc.

It's still on Comedy Central's streaming service, maybe even Amazon Prime? But I'd love to have anons watch. This guy has been slipping things under the radar for years. See the embedded video for starters, but also check out "Tom Hanks is an Asshole" from him.

It was included on the CC streaming service, which is where I saw it, but not aired on TV.

>>4507497

Fair point. Plus, Q has never assuaged the concern anons have had about him since the beginning.

Anons, it is not inherently bigoted/anti-semetic to question the official narrative of the holocaust just because it concerns Jews. Or the narrative about Hitler/WWII. Or to connect dots concerning factions of the cabal that are comprised of Jews or have agendas to advance their interests.

We know we have been deceived on the grandest scale. Don't let certain areas be considered taboo for skeptical research. We should not enforce any official narrative as the mandatory accepted truth on the sub.

On the flip side, don't let debate and investigation on this subject become hate-filled diatribes against all Jews. It's counter-productive and hard to seriously entertain the ideas when they're coupled with the assertion that all Jews or evil or Judaism is inherently reprehensible. It's a topic we've been instilled to associate with deep reverence and emotional weight, so don't shut down genuinely pursuits of truth and discussion by generalizing or being unnecessarily confrontational.

This is a conversation worthy of having, but there are some tactics used here that play right into "their" hands against you instead of actually furthering interest and/or exploration.