>>4512629 (pb)
>>4512629 (pb)
Nice try. This passage refers to the Second Coming of Christ, not Pentecost.
Do we still have that leftover baker from the Daily Stormer?
ahhh….
Preterism.
Don't you guys usually try to say that the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD was the Second Coming?
What then are all the promises of Jesus to (physically) return to earth?