>>451742

It's not following blindly when you've seen the proof for yourself. Are you waiting for MSM to show you arrests? Are you aware that a person can be arrested and released (on a bond) while and the public is none the wiser? And if you're argument is "it's not on public record", why would it be when the risk of the public knowing w/o public preparation would send them into a frenzy?

I myself am no blind follower of anything, I am keenly observant though, and the people in question (in the public eye) are not moving the same as they once did, they are barely keeping their public image afloat. If you've not convinced, well, that's not my job, I can't think for you. What I can do, is recommend that you need to be less of a cynic and more of a skeptic, that leaves room to see w/o clouded judgment.

Take NOTHING and NO ONE on face value, Trust, AND Verify. I've done taht, it's why I'm still here. Worst case scenario, i know more about these fucks being targeted than i knew before, and i know the value of a good psy-op (when it literally makes better human beings in a span of months, there's something to it)

>>451790

just reread. In the bread also, or no?

>>451792

>Not to be blind sheep following without evidence.

I couldn't agree with this more. ? is, have YOU found the same evidence that we have? If you had, you wouldn't still have doubt.

It's really simple,

re_read the crumbs for yourself

You'll either see the evidence when compared to real-life events, or you won't.

>>452004

fuqqqq

Watch the water indeed!

>>452032

Huh?

>>452047

is US underlined? No

>>452070

Not confusing if you're actually reading the bread. Qcode fag literally just gave up an update, scroll up.

http:// qanonposts.com/

>>452109

that's some pretty wild speculation. He's a spook, knows well how to hide. If he were taken in that building and taken into custody then there'd be no need to taunt him. He at least as of 3 days ago is out there & it was known that he's reading here.

>>452109

fuck, just reread, you said november! you meant THAT pic! Good ?

>>452116

looks like a spellcheck of some sort. ES is underlined too, with neither being a full word or name

>>452116

i'm not showing those underlines

>>452109

I've been thinking maybe North Korea

>>452156

>>452156

understood, i have no argument about it now, just that i don't have those in my archs

>>452157

gonna need more proofs than this message. how about you look into that & get back to us?

>>452129

That's a REALLY long Dear John letter. Where do i start?

CONGRESS releases memos, not Q

Q referred to a PASSAGE from cooper's book as Big, not the entire book.

Not touching the Jew shit, I'm not /pol/, ask them to handle it.

The evidence originates organically because it's from our OWN heads, in our OWN words after examining the facts. Don't complicate it beyond that.

Q doesn't indict, why are you assigning all of these jobs to Q that Q doesn't have? Blamestorm maybe? Getting it on record to discredit?

Chemtrails and Geo-engineering. do YOU have proof that Roths are paying for it? If so, present.

Overall, telling "anons" why they should do will only result in your disappointment. Next time, instead of the Dear John letter, just leave.

>>452189

I have to agree with this. I'd be running too

>>452269

>thinks that using the word sorry and "fucking bitch" in the same sentence is actually effective and doesn't sound girly and bitch–like in and of itself

There you are again showing (or acting) like you have no idea of how government works. Who issues indictments, Q, or a grand jury? That's all I'll give you. Take a civics course