>>451550

We should all be calling on Facebook, Twitter and any of the other platforms that took money for Russian ads, that their leadership is put on trial for taking money from a foreign entity to influence an election. They created the liability without the safeguards.

But all honesty, we know this is all bullshit. The only reason they're talking about FB ads is because Hillary fucked up and said that on Colbert (or one of the other shows.) They had to quickly work around her statement to make it a true one.

If I create a company that allows foreigners to meddle in our elections without checks and balances, I should be held accountable. Ignorance is no excuse for the law. Cooperating with enforcement should only get you so far.

Even though I personally know this shit didn't even happen, I feel like we should be pushing for Zuckerberg to be put on trial. If it did actually happen, and one of us folks who is not too big to jail were at the helm, we'd get fucked.

#JailZuck

#FBignoredFECA

By the way, the bumpstock ban is highly unpopular. With me, even.

Parsing POTUS's words is important here. Transcript:

"I just… A few moments ago, I signed a MEMORANDUM directing the Attorney General to PROPOSE REGULATIONS to ban all devices that turn regular weapons into machine guns."

A ban like this will never go into effect. Only the AG will produce a list of proposals to the President who can then turn to Congress (or not) and ask for them to draft legislation.

He's only showing that he's a ballplayer, and it prevents (ha!) the fake news from saying that Trump wouldn't even consider any type of "common sense" gun regulation.

POTUS can now say "hey look, I very obviously DID try."

And no ban will go into effect.

I feel better after watching this again. I trust the plan no doubt. I trust POTUS. I did not agree with this "ban" but it is now very clearly not a ban, but rather a political play.

>>451757

you're right

it's like pissing in the wind

except for how POTUS doesn't play

justice incoming.

>>451632

http:// archive.is/IL4au

https:// www.instagram.com/p/q0bi_pgURH/?taken-by=d_m_h_photography

suprise (looks like someone archived 11hr ago, sorry if repost)

>>451846

the programmer might be complicit / conspired on purpose

the person who deployed it is guilty of direct meddling (and the programmer who trained that person could have had bad intent: conspiracy)

the datacenter that allowed it may have been complicit

etc

>>452074

ADD TO THE LIST