>>4515718 (lb)
The whois record for tribunalreport.com shows a creation date of today (taking into account time zones.) If the use of this name was anticipated in 2013 (when the Twitter account was created), I would expect the authors to have also registered the domain name around the same time. So this seems odd to me. Anyone see a way this domain could have been registered earlier, and still show this way on whois?
whoops, lost my attachments when coming over to post on this bread (last one full)
The whois record for tribunalreport.com shows a creation date of today (taking into account time zones.) If the use of this name was anticipated in 2013 (when the Twitter account was created), I would expect the authors to have also registered the domain name around the same time. So this seems odd to me. Anyone see a way this domain could have been registered earlier, and still show this way on whois?
The takeaway may be that "Tribunal Report" wasn't a name they anticipated before this month.
I took the 2013 Twitter account date to mean they'd long anticipated the use of this name, implying insider status.
The whois creation date would suggest otherwise. (May still be a good site, just not as insider as I'd thought)