I have a question about shills. (As a cabal-related phenomenon of research interest.)

I see shill weather reports, by which I mean observations of shill gusts and shill precipitation as an indicator of cabal forces, a downwind impact of shill interests. For better understanding this particular phenomenon, I have some basic questions (which I've kind of ignored by now because … ignoring shills is the Thing To Do, so I try to ignore them, if they were a lamppost I'd walk right into them. Thunk. Because we ignore shills.)

So. Are the shills more like street thugs, clerical workers, robots, or frightened mob bosses?

We know they come from the cabal. But I don't know who actually is doing it.

The options I see:

1) Street thugs. Brainless internet muscle, posting because they're told to do so, possibly with no understanding of what's going on.

2) Clerical workers. It's a task, a job, shuffle the papers. Regular work, day in and day out. May be so naive they think they're doing something noble, if they think about it at all. Or even if they know what it's all about, it's a kind of soulless mundane activity.

3) Robots. Program bots that do stuff without there even being a brain involved at the per-post level. Scripts with evil programmers.

4) Cabal mobsters. People who understand what the cabal is about, are personally at risk from the storm, and know it.

Understanding the source would help me better understand the implications of variations in shill posting frequency, and other things like that.

For example, if it's clerical workers with regular hours I wouldn't expect any variation in posting frequency as things happen. Same with robots. (Or if there's variation it's because they pull clerical workers off one job and put them on another.)

But if it's coming from cabal bosses who come here when they freak out, then they're giving us a realtime indicator of something meaningful.

Anyway … just curious about this, because there are some quite different possibilities out there, and I figure others have a better understanding of what's going on. Usually any shillish topic is just the usual "respond to shill" mistakes and "don't respond to shill" reminders, or "here is what shilling is, how to ignore it, how to understand it's part of how the cabal tries to incite division" education for newbies … I hope this is different and more relevant.

>>4517929

This isn't current info - this is about the process before a 2008 Supreme Court ruling. The prior system was called "Combatant Status Review Tribunal". I'd like to know more about how the process changed. But this is a good starting point, since many people may have heard of the process pre-2008 and it's important to know that it changed due to a SC ruling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combatant_Status_Review_Tribunal

On June 12, 2008 the Supreme Court ruled in the case Boumediene v. Bush, 5–4, that Guantanamo captives were entitled to access the US justice system.[27][28][29][30]

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion:

The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.

The Court also ruled that the Combatant Status Review Tribunals were "inadequate".[27] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens joined Kennedy in the majority.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in the dissenting opinion, called the CSR Tribunals:[27]

… the most generous set of procedural protections ever afforded aliens detained by this country as enemy combatants.

Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia joined Roberts in the dissent.[28]