>John F. Kelly says his tenure as Trump's chief of staff is best measured by what the president did not do
And because you read it in the LA Times, you believe it?
True.
Why do you reply to shills?
>So my question is; why would Trump go with this?
Maybe because even the President of the US cannot just end the globalist-UN-world-order.
Maybe he has achieved something here, hopefully, and maybe he couldn't achieve more for now.
What idiotic reply is this? Filtered.
Ty.
Yes, he had(!) to come to an agreement.
And is it easy to criticise, what he achieved.
But Canada and Mexico are NWO strongholds, we know Trudeau's stand on the UN and we do remember that Mexico's response to the Caravan and Potus closing the border was, to call the UN for help and support…
Imo, Potus did, what was possible in those negotiations, achieved something and will have to go on from there.
The article didn't mention the obstacles that still exist. The author just blamed Trump and not the way too mighty UN.
Imo there are two reliable sources atm:
Potus, because I trust him, and Q, because without trusting Q, I wouldn't be here.
But I will try to verify whatever Q hints at, because trusting alone, won't do it for me, regarding Q.
All other news sources, maybe reliable, maybe not, maybe comped or just NWO-shills.
Yes, agree.
But imo the grip of the UN on the countries must be broken.
As long, as all these crimes cannot be tied back to the UN as an organisation founded or corrupted to be involved in all these crimes, not much is won.