Appeal to authority, or argumentum ad vericundium, is considered a logical fallacy.
Especially when one does not recognize the authority to which one is referred.
When we go on about Q, say things such as >Q said< or repost Q comms on other platforms to inform normies we make a big mistake. Multiply by ten when we talk about numerical messages we decode from POTUS tweets. We sound like a cult.
People are right to shy away because it is very difficult to establish Q as a credible authority.
Q is being quoted as scripture.
Q is being held by followers as above POTUS.
This is counter to the methods of Anonymous. Every message holds the authority of the person who delivers it only. It stands or falls on its own merits. Thats why we are different.
George Washington rules for civility:
>79th Be not apt to relate News if you know not the truth thereof. In Discoursing of things you Have heard Name not your Author always A Secret Discover not.