>>4530522

That is an interesting claim Anon.

Perhaps you can post the "correct version".

The ClockFags will continue to work on the version we have developed. The dates were added because the old final date was surpassed.

The clock work continues. Not a lot of us who are dedicated to exploring it though. Can always use more Anons.

>>4530656

Thanks Anon.

Couldn't find the webster clock on my computer but remember doing it. Feel free to repost.

Here is another one I found while looking.

>>4530702

Lots of moon clocks have been done.

Looks like another one will be relevant.

>>4530875

The ClockFags are making good use of the one we have. It has been developed and vetted by the ClockFags.

Concern fagging by other Anons ( who haven't contributed to the study) that it isn't correct is irrelevant. We are on the 7th Clockwork Qrange bread using our current system.

Any of those Anons are free to provide the ClockFags with a better version.

We have had plenty of confirmations of the current clock and the way we are using it.

Here is one for today for the night shift.

Switching to ipad and going to bed.

Any Anons who are seriously interested in the Clock should review all the work that has gone into the current one before just criticizing it as "wrong".

>>4531079

>6f964f

You have contribute nothing to the discussion Anon.

KYSF. Do a flip.