Create context.

There is an obvious truth at hand here, that only WE can discuss. In another time we were called eccentrics. The deep thinkers, the polymaths, the rennisance men. Today we are called autists. But essentially we are philosophers. We are not "common folk," so that is why it must be admitted here. Get ready for a certain pill.

The truth is that 1. all religions are false, and 2. there is no god.

The second truth is a statement made by a philosopher. Only a philosopher. A philosopher knows the truth about religion and mythology.

However, it is not the same for the common people. They are meant to believe, and not question. Obey, and not question. Us here, we can handle the truth. We do not need to "convert" each other to other beliefs. We can certainly advocate as to which is most USEFUL, but I am hoping that the people here on this forum in particular already know the truth, and are merely trying to suggest which religion is to dominate during our renewed glorious republic.

To be quite honest, I do not think Christianity will work. I think that it gives people a "white knight" outlook, where if they see something they do not like, for a common person, they will simply assume that 'God' also does not like that thing. They will point to a thing and call it evil, and believe that 'God' agrees.

Then they will do terrible things to stop it, no matter if it is evil or not. Social Justice Warriors or your typical internet Biblethumper/Missionary. Thus we require better defined concepts to engage the general public.

And this same concept holds true of "Moral Relativity."

(1/2)

>>4532070

Yes, the simple truth is that all ethics and morals are made up, and none are true. There is no objective morality. But again, this is a philosopher's game. It is not for the common folk. The common folk are meant to truly believe that whatever ethics the empire deems good, are truly good. The empire in this case is hopefully a benevolent empire, and not a corrupted one. This way, the people will do good.

But this good is according to the one that told them what good is. Their parents, their education, their friends and community, and the governmental leaders. And even the media. If even one element is corrupted, things will not be so good.

But I must heavily stress here, this is a philosopher's dilemma, and ONLY a philosopher's dilemma. It is not for the common folk to question. It is for YOU to quickly understand without wasting time: There is no god and all morality is completely made up. Thus we must move on quickly to the important question: What will bind our people and forge our culture, and what is good, and what is evil?

We cannot play a game of actually believing these religions or even our own cultural paradigms. We will need to deliberately think for ourselves, and formulate our own morality and law, and then we will simply implement it, and it will not be questioned by the common folk, except during democratic moments of polling.

The point is that this logic CANNOT be questioned by the common person, for social reasons, just as the common man cannot question Diversity Dogma today. It is seen as socially offensive to do so.

It was once the same with religion. Questioning Christianity was not wise, even for philosophers. You would be socially destroyed, or burned to death. It must be the same for our Republic. We will reform our culture based upon shared values and mythos. Whatever we use, it must provide SPIRIT to the people.

And it is the same with our morals. We cannot be utilizing ancient morality from ancient mythology. We must remake morality from scratch. And now we are approaching the perfect time.

Who gets this? Does everyone understand what I mean here? Or am I talking to mind-virus infected fools who just want to spread their little religion, instead of comprehending the glory of rebuilding a Great Republic, its religion, and its laws?

(2/2)