Anonymous ID: 4517bd Dec. 31, 2018, 3:36 a.m. No.4533687   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3691 >>3806 >>3852 >>4336 >>4368

>>4533674

>>4533677

Here is the Qdrop I was referencing…

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0365ff No.4381184

 

Dec 19 2018 18:14:15 (EST)

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0365ff No.4381127

 

Dec 19 2018 18:11:25 (EST)

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/flynn-hearing-leaves-far-right-s-conspiracy-theorists-wanting-n949626

 

The clock is ticking.

When will the 1st alarm ring?

If the Senate was the primary target (majority control)….

53-47 active when?

EO (designated_target(s)) active when?

Ongoing investigations…..

"There are a lot of sealed indictments" - SC

"It's all going to come out, U1, Dossier, CF, etc…." - SH

"I have pretty good sources…" - SH

There is a reason why SH, SC, and JS are on stage.

Q

>>4381127

Why does the FAKE NEWS media continually attack a (as they say) so-called 'only a conspiracy' 'nothing to see here' 'lonely guy behind a keyboard' movement?

The largest media co's in the world giving so much attention….

WASH POST leading the attack?

Logical thinking always wins.

Q

Anonymous ID: 4517bd Dec. 31, 2018, 4:17 a.m. No.4533819   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4533765

 

That's interesting…cuz the other day, I thought it was odd that the Dept of Defense posted a video of Taps being played at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

 

I immediately thought of Poppie being put to death.

Anonymous ID: 4517bd Dec. 31, 2018, 5:36 a.m. No.4534148   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4533965

"A" is supposed to be capitalized (beginning of a sentence.

" Never Abandoned" entered into the anagram solver = Doe v Braden wiki link

Bricker Amendment

Cherokee Tobacco, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 616 (1870) at 621–622. See also Doe v. Braden, 57 U.S. (16 How.) 635 (1835). [11], Botiller v. Dominguez, 130 U.S

81 KB (11,148 words) - 09:22, 22 October 2018

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bricker_Amendment

 

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Bricker Amendment

 

"Senator John W. Bricker, the sponsor of the proposed constitutional amendment to limit the "treaty power" of the United States government

The Bricker Amendment is the collective name of a number of slightly different proposed amendments to the United States Constitution considered by the United States Senate in the 1950s. Each of these amendments would have insulated American laws and policies from foreign influence exerted through treaties, executive agreements, international law or the United Nations. They are named for their sponsor, Republican Senator John W. Bricker of Ohio.

The best-known version of the Bricker Amendment, considered by the Senate in 1953–54, declared that no treaty could be made by the United States that conflicted with the Constitution; treaties could not be self-executing without the passage of separate enabling legislation through Congress; treaties could not give Congress legislative powers beyond those specified in the Constitution. It also limited the president's power to enter into executive agreements with foreign powers.

Bricker's proposal attracted broad bipartisan support and was a focal point of intra-party conflict between the administration of president Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Old Right faction of conservative Republican senators. Despite the initial support, the Bricker Amendment was blocked through the intervention of President Eisenhower with then-Senate Minority Leader Lyndon Johnson and failed in the Senate by a single vote in 1954. Three years later the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly ruled in Reid v. Covert that the Bill of Rights cannot be abrogated by agreements with foreign powers. Nevertheless, Senator Bricker's ideas still have supporters, and new versions of his amendment have been reintroduced in Congress periodically. "

 

Just spitballing, but maybe something like this is on our horizon…. what with our new govt coming. "Our movement is about replacing

A failed and corrupt political establishment

With a new government controlled by you, the American people…."