Anonymous ID: 84001b Dec. 31, 2018, 7:18 a.m. No.4534845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4861 >>4896

>>4534729

>>4534776

 

From the 12-18-18 Order that is public…

 

"…the Corporation moved to quash claiming (1) that it is immune under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“the Act”) …"

 

"…the Act’s only provision related to subject-matter jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1330(a),

grants

subject-matter jurisdiction over certain “nonjury civil action[s].” The provision includes nothing at all about criminal jurisdiction…."

 

So it is a criminal case and not civil.

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/395974126/12-18-18-DC-Circuit-Grand-Jury-Subpoena

Anonymous ID: 84001b Dec. 31, 2018, 7:24 a.m. No.4534896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4898

>>4534729

>>4534776

>>4534845

 

Given the quick response from both sides I have a theory that both sides in this case are working together…to set precedent maybe for some of the more unfriendly cases that are sealed? So in this case the Defendant entity owned by Country A is a 'cooperating witness' and will earn credit towards their penalty for cooperating (not asking for extensions, getting briefs/responses/replies in quickly, etc.)