>>4535931

I took it to be a shift over to a new server platform/structure.

The various network tests that were being done indicated evaluations for some purpose or another. Then we suddenly have an outage where posting is disabled but "read only" is fine. That suggests they were performing an overhaul of how posting works and may have even been using a different network topography.

This is, also, just ahead of "big habbenings" that have the potential for a net shutdown.

Tinyboard is a very simple and flexible platform that is a sort of CB for the internet. It would not be surprising if there were plans in place to keep tinyboard platforms up and hosted in the face of larger network outages or DNS freezes.

I don't think it was an attack. I think we are seeing a rerouting of infrastructure in preparation for something big.

There again - I could be wrong. I have a mind for the sensational in the face of the mundane.

>>4536024

Anon… I'm going to reeee for a moment, here.

Confirmation bias coupled with dunning-krueger in your case. The overwhelming percentage of aircraft in the sky >98%, are not spraying anything. Those are contrails. Atmospheric conditions for contrails vary and, frankly, the subject is still under study as no one can reliably predict when and where contrails will form from what engine and at what throttle settings.

Logic also dictates that there is no way for that exhaust contrail to affect you on the ground. Nothing released at that altitude in the form of vapor or micronized dust will return to the ground unless precipitated out of a very powerful thunderstorm.

The military did a bunch of studies on the aerosol distribution of chemical and biological agents. Optimal dispersion is at night - ultraviolet from the sun destroys many organic compounds and bacteria/viruses, and at an altitude of usually less than a thousand feet AGL.

Chemtrails are mostly in your head. There have been a few programs here and there to try and play around with the atmosphere, but most aircraft in the sky are civilian airliners. If you want to believe all of them are loading up with chemical sprayers - then you believe humanity is fundamentally evil, or hopelessly retarded.

If you want to argue that there's some manner of fuckery with the fuels - then at least form some manner of plausible and coherent thesis.

>>4536311

I am well aware of what has been "disclosed." I am also well aware of aviation in general. Kind of my thing.

Please read what I said, again, with the understanding that I have known about what you linked to since 2006. They've been talking about this type of thing for well over a decade. One cute idea was actually placing titanium dust in orbit around the planet, sourced from the moon.

What they've actually done is just enough to get a check in the mail for the research grant and not get taken to court for fraud.

>>4536342

Here is the problem, anon… Aircraft are going to make contrails indefinitely. Unless you get nuclear powered jet engines or some kind of ducted fan design that has no combustion - there will be water vapor as the result of the combustion process and that will condense into ice crystals that refract light within the atmosphere.

Period.

Here's the thing - they are going to do this whether they are "spraying" or not. If you want to investigate the fuel loaded into aircraft or crack open wings to look for sprayers - then that is what you are going to need to do in order to satisfy your chemtrail fetish.

Otherwise - they aren't going to stop. It's part of how high bypass engines work. Maybe there is an additive that can reduce crystal formation just to cool your tits - but then most of what you are worried about them possibly spraying isn't visible… So… Whatever.

If you think engine contrails in the sky are an indicator of a conspiracy to spray things on you, then prepare to be a neurotic mess until you die - because physics doesn't so easily dismiss the issue of contrail formation.

>>4536411

False accusations will get you nowhere with me, anon.

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/47773/how-does-engine-exhaust-temperature-affect-contrail-formation-and-why

I'm not going to say that they have never sprayed anything out of an airplane. I will, however, tell you that a contrail is not a reliable indicator that something is being sprayed. It has mostly to do with engine temperature, which is highly influenced by engine design and relative throttle settings.

High bypass engines, which are more efficient and therefor more common on modern designs, have exhaust temperatures that are more conducive to contrail formation.

You want planes without contrails, get rid of combustion. They could still spray or dust, though, and you wouldn't know it.