Anonymous ID: 3f2686 Dec. 31, 2018, 8:35 p.m. No.4544911   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4953

>>4544780

So two things. There is nothing to tell you that is a "Presidential Aircraft" it could be full of guards, cooks, perps and JAGs. If there was a president on board it would also need to have an E4B airborne and nearby because it isn't the 747 command AF1 we are used to a President travelling in. Not that any of these would advertise their presence by turning on transponders…… so let's keep it cool for a little longer.

Anonymous ID: 3f2686 Dec. 31, 2018, 8:47 p.m. No.4545125   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5154

>>4545039

This is total bullshit. Ignore. The wave of ignorance and blind hope in this post is disturbing. There is nothing to indicate AF1 (President on board) - in fact it is shown as SAM991. He did use this trick for IRAQ 25th/26th but I very much doubt he would do it again. The flight is however a 'Special Air Mission" SAM and was on direct track for NBW - Guantanamo Naval Air Station. This appears to be a plain fag as opposed to a Planefag.