How do you introduce evidence into court, anon?
In a corrupt court, sure, Mueller's case is a threat. However, if the courts are operating properly, then Mueller's case becomes something else, entirely. Courts have the power to subpoena any agency and to force disclosure of documents. The authority to classify comes from the President of the United States and no document(s) shall be classified on the basis of preventing embarrassment or to cover up a crime.
Seeing where this goes?
On that note… I could ask what it is you're doing. You come onto these boards to antagonize people, then get pissy with them. You're a rather intelligent person - smart enough I would expect you to be aware of your own contradictions.
What has you so frustrated and irritated that this is how you 'unwind' by starting a silly argument with edgy people who you know are going to escalate?
You're not exactly doing yourself any favors here.
It's a board with no real rules, anon.
We can't stop to point out or yell at everything we find disagreeable. While it is true that there is such a thing as "tacit consent/approval" - it's also true that we don't need to be hall monitors.
I don't disagree with your assessment of the meme - it's in poor taste. Your reaction to it, though, was (I believe) deliberately inflammatory and designed to create a stir. For people who enjoy being forum gladiators, it's a classic "aggro" strategy to pull the board and tank.
But I think this is also reinforcing your own bias. Most people are going to respond simply. We're on a free speech board and here's someone trying to play hall monitor - they'll attack the hall monitor before they attack the kid who is bullying his little sister. That might be a little fucked up in terms of priority - but if I had to hazard a guess, you're here because you can be anonymous and speak your mind - mouth full of a string of insults you have to bite your tongue on everywhere else.
Careful what you wish for, anon.
Sheesh. Pic related.
I can easily ask… What if a girl decides to not show her boobs? Who bans them?
I understand the point of Tits or GTFO - but you all beat a drum in a vacuum to the point it stops being neat and crosses the line into retarded.
You believe you have intelligence (ie - information) that shows Q is not real. You've got an active group and have dug into my history. You've a reason to have that group and to be investigating people - which makes you no mere average person no matter how you slice and dice it.
You aren't wrong for not believing in Santa, per se - but you're getting ready to commit to a series of actions that will have consequences. If the people you trust are wrong…