Every time someone says that, Q posts.
I've got bets on Q posting at roughly 11pm est.
>What is their mission, to disrupt, distort, disturb, destruct?
Yes.
>By logic, dont they show, by what (((they))) promote, that those are the very things that are destructive to the soul?
Yes.
>Don't (((they))) inadvertently prove that the content they say is harmless to you is not?
yes.
>but why do they want you to ingest their particular choosing of content?
yes.
It's partially part of the mku conditioning program. One would have to be completely naive to think [they] don't use those techniques here.
Part of that is manufacturing consensus for behaviors, and trying to gaslight those who have been around long enough to know what the real landscape has been here into not trusting their own memory of it. ← This sentence was constructed in a specific way to make a specific point.
the non-frens don't want to play nice with others.. So it's [their] own fault. like this asshole → >>4551434
> I can admit to being an asshole, though.
fair enough.. the mossad jab was more sarc than anything else.. there's enough of those here that even if you aren't one…
Well, let's just say I wouldn't want to have to worry about you sticking your head up like an idiot and getting yourself or me shot irl… because I don't trust your motives.
Enjoy the movie.
>As if I trust you, anon. LMAO.
Please don't. The point here is to verify all.
>You're enjoying being sold out to the MOFOs who are gonna rule over your children, your children's children, your children's children's childen, your, ….. you get it.
I'm here to observe and be a witness to the destruction of satanic traitors. If HRC had won, eery patriot posting here would be dead or in prison.
>You're just letting them walk in and take over.
If you like I can start posting the year of happenings in review again, like I did earlier today.
>Like I trust you, anon, NOT. NOT THE FUCK AT ALL.
see above. Trusting anything posted here without verifying it for yourself, is folly.
>You're a bad decision maker and a rotten judge of character.
…And you're an anger troll and a shitty projector. Good day.
>You're being entirely melodramatic about everyone here being dead if Clinton had one
A cursory reading of the evidence shows this to be true. If you refuse to look at that evidence, that is on you.
The 16 year plan is all over those recovered emails.
>Anger your buthole, anon. I take offence at being called angry. I'm clearly not.
You're clearly fixating on an agenda.
Pretty much. Many anons got hung up on dates, while forgetting that the movies is a military operation.
Because if HRC had assumed the presidency, The military would have done a blatant coup.
I think people don't take that into consideration, a lot here.
It's the main reason why the oldfags don't fuck around when it comes to certain shit… Shitposting aside of course ;p
We can call it that.. Thank God.
You think the cabal party in NYC was sick?
Imagine if [they] had been able to roll out [their] plan A…