>>4555905 (lb)
Nice try.
happy to discuss the realities with you, but starting to regret giving you a chance.
Your argument:
indemnity for PG&E bad:
Ban on ddt killed millions
Ban on Glyphosate killing millions
Ban on GMOs killing millions
Because: Moar food
What's fake about the science your fellow shareholders spend SOOOO MUCH TIME AND….
ENERGY
discrediting?
Please… let's discuss this
name 1 fucking vaccine that saved more lives than it took and fucking PROVE IT.
No fronthole "oh you're an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist" castigation in here, anon…
What the fuck do you know about the science and history of vaccines?
Any one.
Pick!
So this is what a "I'm way too sophisticated and intelligent to take the time to talk to a crazy conspiracy theorist anti-vaxxer" deflection from real debate looks like in a room full of real debaters.
duly noted.
Still waiting for you to provide support that ANY vaccine passes this test:
1) legitimate need- less people die because of it, or less people are seriously injured because of it, than there are deaths or serious injuries from taking it.
2) Effective: It prevents the ILLNESS it was designed to prevent
3) no unintended consequences that significantly reduce the value of the vaccine based on proper consideration of 1 and 2.
Whooping cough rates are increased because of the Whooping cough vaccine, anon.
The vaccine (pertussis) doesn't prevent transmission of pertussis, it just reduces symptoms. Sounds ok and all, except that we have this natural defense mechanism from spreading disease: cough.
Grandma and Grandpa don't go to visit baby when they KNOW they're sick.
Add to that the fact they're more likely to get sick when the vaccine temporarily compromises their immune system, and that they just got the stupid fucking shot because they were planning to visit and that's what the doc told them to do, and it looks about identical to every other major mistake committed daily by the scientists and doctors we trust. Starting to wonder how many of these accidental mistakes are really accidental?
“This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said Dr. Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health at BUSPH and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”
https://www.aspph.org/bu-resurgence-of-whooping-cough-may-owe-to-vaccines-inability-to-prevent-infections/
The study confirming what I just said.
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/111/2/787.full.pdf