This is the thread for all POTUS Tweet Timestamp Decodes and Discussions.

Regardless of whether Q is posting or not, they are always keeping in close contact with us, to let us know how the next step of the Plan will unfold, or to highlight Q Posts to be reviewing/digging, types of memes to be preparing etc.

I am still learning the finer points of the Comms method used, but over the past 2 months since I recognised that POTUS Tweet timestamps were being used to communicate with us, have developed a good appreciation for the decoding methods employed, and will share these with you, with a hope that others will get interested in joining me in decoding, and give this lesser known comms method the recognition it deserves.

Sadly my explanations/decodes were getting swamped amongst the bantz and shills/shitposters in /QResearch General, so hoping that having a separate thread will help keep the information together in a more user friendly fashion.

ANALYSIS OF POTUS TWEETS FOR RELEVANT CRUMBS (PART I):

Reposting from >>4513390

Currently there are 2 different methods of Tweet Analysis/Decoding appear to be used for POTUS Tweets

1) Analysis of Tweet Content, including Capitals and Numbers (which includes Gematria) - by the likes of SerialBrain2 and others

2) Analysis of Tweet Time Stamps and Deltas Between Tweets (this is what I have been looking into)

Personally I have focussed on (2) above since I noticed several identical tweets being re-tweeted, and wondered why POTUS would be doing that. By analysing the Tweet data I was able to correlate that to specific relevant Q drops or parts thereof.

Since then I have been digging into the timestamp data to see what significant information they contain.

As you will soon realise, there is very specific timing to each of POTUS Tweets - they aren’t just haphazardly posted when the Prez has 5 minutes to spare.

Each Tweet has been specifically constructed to encode the message it contains (Capitals, Numbers & Gematria) and then posted at the specific time, down to the exact second, that it was required to be posted, so that not only does the Tweet Content convey as much info as possible to Patriots, but also the time stamps and deltas between tweet postings can also be used to direct us to the relevant Q drops that they want us to be focussing on re-reading or piecing together.

Currently there are over 2640 Q drops which can be referenced by POTUS Tweets Timestamps. And how might this be done? Well by the fact that the Q matrix was designed in the first place to be able to point to different strings of information based on each Q drop timecode, as well as other relevant data contained in the specific Q drop. So you can understand for this to occur that each Q drop also had to be meticulously designed and then posted at a specific time down to the second as well.

Now I know the doubt fags will say it is not possible to post down to an exact second, but recall POTUS on 20/12/2018 posted two Tweets at exactly the same time down to the second @ 5:21:07PM. This wasn’t just by chance, proving it can be done, regardless of whatever dinsinfo Q has said in Q#2247 about [0] Delta = [0:00] = [0:00:17].

Coincidentally this 0:00 Tweet Posting Delta was then used to highlight that the specific Tweets involved were significant, which was also signified by the overall Time Delta from the 1st Tweet that day being 17:17:02 (17= Q of course). These are just some of the signs used to indicate look over here - this is important.

So I have alluded to the fact that not only the Delta between Tweets being important, but also the Delta from the 1st Tweet each day is important, as it can also be used to convey relevant information vital to decoding each Tweet.

In my next Post I plan to go through a Tweet decode step by step, to show you exactly how its done and to give you an appreciation of the complexity of the Q Matrix.

PART II:

Thats the beauty of the whole POTUS taking to Twitter in 2016 .. POTUS set up plausible deniability from the word go by going to Twitter as he did, little did everyone realise Q has been pointing to specific Q posts all along via the time stamps and deltas.

Things got a lot more complicated re decodes and disinformation in late Nov, due to upcoming D5 fears, and Q not wanting to give any meaningful info away. For now lets work with a simple example.

In essence, every tweet is posted at a time of XX:YY:ZZ and then an intra delta is calculated between each pair of digits. ie XX:YY:ZZ reduces to (XX-YY):(YY-ZZ)

So for instance a post at 7:50:43 would reduce to (50-7):(50-43) = 43:07

A search of Q drops for the terms 43:07 and 4307 would then be conducted, in this case finding 0 hits for 43:07 and 1 hit for 4307.

The term found is contained in Q1806 (as shown in the attached above).

The final task would then be to seek confirmation of the specific timecode from nearby data (ie 10:09:53). So it means searching for the numbers 10, 09 and 53 in close proximity to each other in the data set. This would then provide final confirmation that the Q drop/message is the one you were meant to find.

I have personally seen Tweet decodes searched pointing to specific Q drops, attachments within Q drops, and even other Twitter/weblinks - it is in this way that they can direct you to exactly the documents/articles they are wanting you to see.

At roughly 10-20 POTUS Tweets per day, with anywhere from 2 - 30 specific Q-drops highlighted from each Tweet decode, it is understandably a lot of work to decode properly, both physically and mentally, but the joy of seeing something drop a few days later in the news which verifies the drops you were looking at makes it all worth it.

Just want to put it out there … We received 17 Tweets today (2 Jan 2019) from POTUS (= another nod to Q).

I always like it when I see a 17 or 1111, 55, 45 or 23 among the tweet timestamp data because these numbers are significant to the Q Plan, and they usually aren't there by chance alone - they normally signify something of importance about the tweet.

Not sure whether this was already planned by POTUS/Q or whether someone in the Q team saw my posts on NYE (when we had received 16 Tweets for the day by 9:30PM US EST) as I had posted several times before midnight asking if we would get to see one more BIG ONE with a significant timestamp like 11:55:11 PM so we would also hit the magical 17 Tweets that day.

It wouldn't be the first time I have seen significant markers in tweets displayed in my local time zone, which has led to me focussing on decoding particular tweets of significance.

>>4562822

Oops 1st Jan not 2nd Jan