Anonymous ID: e556b3 Feb. 2, 2019, 11:10 a.m. No.5003784   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4962574

Yes they are from significant Q/POTUS deltas. However, some disagree with the #3 delta of [3].

 

Over at Excel thread, they think the first 5 sequence of deltas should be 15-15-5-10-5 which I can't get to fit nicely in a sequence with rule for it. A sequence should have a rule.

 

I will keep trying.

 

Let me know if you guys here have a different sequence for the five Q/POTUS deltas where Q already showed the 4th delta as [10].

 

I will try to work it.

Anonymous ID: e556b3 Feb. 2, 2019, 11:23 a.m. No.5003891   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4962574

The Q368 post implies they are sequential. Q gives us a crossword-puzzle type clue to bring our attention to the [10] delta for the 4th Q/POTUs delta.

 

Having done that, Q allowed us to say Ok I will work backwards and forward from the #4 delta.

 

Hope that helps.

Anonymous ID: e556b3 Feb. 3, 2019, 5:31 p.m. No.5019966   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5018665

Deltas between posts and "inner" or pictured posts are becoming very interesting. I think we are looking at timestamps and deltas with an awareness now that, even if we can't piece it together now, we have never been so aware.

 

Good observing. Stay that aware. I like a collaborative environment where people can say, Hey I am looking at this. What do you think?

 

In this thread, I think we should borrow the Q admonition, "If you SEE something, SAY something,"