correct. :)
meh. people are complex. is probably a good thing to be multifaceted vs. 1 dimensional.
Maaaybe?
Am not convinced they're an "us", tho. IF they are an "us" I would think they'd be far more interested in giving the documents to people with the ability to actually act on the potential information.
What this does seem to be is an attempt to muddy the waters for some folks.
Most importantly, how can these docs be verified by those who DO download and read them? (I don't think they CAN be verified as legit, can they?) That's not a great thing - the absence of verification.
"Normies" aren't going to be hip to the hacker/radical justice thing, are they?
And our gamesmanship is far more sophisticated.
For example: Many "normies" seem to think that this place is the Dark Web.
Not a "fun" read, yet is a worthwhile read:
https://www.govinfo.gov/features/911-commission-report#
Scared of what??
Come to your own conclusion, fren.
Glenn Greenwald had some thoughts about this, as well!
(Short read)
https://observer.com/2018/12/glenn-greenwald-on-sucker-journalists-and-why-theres-no-silver-bullet-coming-for-trump/
Could be.
The problem I see is how Bitcoin-demanding nihilists can be incorporated into a plan that is about the betterment of a thing?
Bitcoin's "value" bounces all over the place, so it's not quite "worthless".
I don't know what DS knows, so definitely can't speak to that.
And I'm not following the "guaranteed release" part of your speculation. Help a dumdum out?
I agree. There's a crypto currency butthole that hangs out here and uuuuggghhh…. That guy.
ha!
Since I'm not psychic (and don't actually care enough to dig on the hackers), I have noooo idea what is motivating this. Maybe intimidation? That seems kind of lame, tho.
My OPINION (emphasis on OPINION) is that it's an attempt to confuse people who are legit seeking the truth and may fall into the "declas now" category of truth seekers.
And I ultimately do not know.
Disclaimer: One anon was somewhat emphatically suggesting that it's a great way to get "normies" talking or activated or something, and that is the one opinion I do very strongly disagree with.