>>4563802

I believe this is likely about securing the Senate majority.

Let the strongest potential detractor step out, cause controversy, then get bitch-slapped and "fall back in line".

• Result: any other R thinking of trying it decides it's futile, and falls in line. R's are unified for the upcoming Senate votes needed for many actions.

Crucial "lock-in" phase.

>>4564152

Likely 'locked in' the plan over dinner.

See: >>4563804

(not sure what else that anon has posted, have the fucker auto-filtered, 61 posts in bread and counting!)