>>4563997

>he has positioned himself as the next Jeff Flake

The question is, and I think/hope POTUS was implying this, another Jeff Flake in regards to his actions or another Jeff Flake in regards to who's pulling Romney's strings?

Emphasizes the message sent and we'll have to wait to see how it was received.

>>4564117

If it's in the situation room can anything about it be discussed off the record (leaked)?

That is, should there only be an official version of what transpired and nothing else?