Anonymous ID: 776202 Jan. 2, 2019, 8:38 a.m. No.4565396   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4565206

Depends on your use of it and communication of it.

Weeks are based around quarters of the lunar cycle. Twenty-eight (well… Technically 29 and some change) days for a full lunar cycle. Years are pretty obvious.

Longer periods of time tracked the pattern of the planet Venus or other stars.

The longest one we track is the precession of the sunrise against the constellations on the vernal equinox - which is about 24,000 years long.

 

These calendars are "perfect." They can predict eclipses and other such things with extreme accuracy.

Theybare just cumbersome to use for business and social planning. Thus - we have standard calendars.

The lunar new year is different from the solar new year, as well. The solar new year falls on the apogee of Earth's orbit, or the Perigee if you're using the southern hemisphere's shorter winter as your marker.

Anonymous ID: 776202 Jan. 2, 2019, 8:52 a.m. No.4565533   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5542 >>5570

>>4565169

I don't think you should let Q determine your goals in life, anon.

I found this place because I was looking to do much of what Q has promised via Trump's campaign… Just didn't have the resources to do it as clean/neatly.

What Trump campaigned on is a sort of revolution that would put the nation back in the hands of the people. It's about giving people the opportunity to live freely.

Many people may never fully know or understand what happened. Most will probably realize that something has changed and that the old way of things was dangerously corrupt - but I think they will mostly realize that they are in a new world, more so than be part of a fight for one.

 

That isn't a slight against them, really. They do not deserve what has been done to them, and it is only proper that those who understand what has been done make efforts to make it right. In our case, a lot of that isn't necessarily to take up arms - but to take up teaching, innovating, and exploring new paths of business in the spirit of a true free market.

 

What Q, Trump, and myself want to see (if I may speak for them) is a world where you are not a debt-slave, where you can pursue your interests both in terms of hobby/sport and business/employ. It is to see families rebuilt and the creativity of people open to exploration.

 

It won't all be lollipops and unicorns - but the overwhelming majority of people are good. We are not cattle and we are not servants.

Anonymous ID: 776202 Jan. 2, 2019, 9:06 a.m. No.4565711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4565542

It's not like we aren't telling them, anon.

God knows, we've been doing so. I've laid out detailed essays that source and prove a number of deep state fuckery issues.

 

Sure - there is some bitterness, there. People complacent and ignorant of the system perpetuate it and its abuses by proxy. If you want to wait for them to finally start listening to you, however, in order for them to be deserving of a new world, then you're of the same mindset as the cabal that currently rules them. Or acting accordingly.

Sure, there are some who will be eating their shoe for a while and some humility will do them some good - but you're getting into dangerous territory with your line of thinking.

 

What is wrong is wrong. Whether or not a child understands the abuse they are suffering is irrelevant to how a good person responds to it.

Anonymous ID: 776202 Jan. 2, 2019, 9:12 a.m. No.4565780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5856

>>4565666

That's a rather remote possibility. Stupid enough that the deep state could try it and think it's brilliant.

Who is going to be doing the round-ups? Are my friends and family still in the military going to arrest me? Are the couple dozen police per ten thousand people going to make mass arrests?

If that's their plan, they had better not miss with the first shot. They will not get a second.

Anonymous ID: 776202 Jan. 2, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.4565880   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4565795

Well, that is one way to look at it.

Though your assertion would seem to lead… Where? Fear? Paranoia?

Because we suddenly fear Q might turn on us (… In which case, why bring us together when he can read our fucking messages as we type them?) - we should… …. Do … What? Attack Q or the government? Hole up behind claymore mines?

 

Your what-if really goes almost nowhere the "what if Q fails?" Question and contingency doesn't already cover. The answers are effectively the same, you are just trying to move the goal posts for "failure."