POSTED LATE LAST BREAD

many of us have an uneasy feeling about Pence and that something is about to happen regarding him. I am struggling to understand a possible scenario that has never happened before but it seems like there is something in the air that suggests it could be attempting to happen. The Marine who was shot in the Capitol Hill barracks would have the duty of protecting the Hill and nothing to do with POTUS' protection. POTUS oddly talked about many marines with machine guns on the WH lawn. I think those things are related and an attempt was made on Grassley so marines went on high alert for POTUS. I need a civics lesson on what would happen if VP resigns and president pro tempore is assassinated before another is sworn in? What would happen if tomorrow's president pro tempore was killed before being sworn ( Grasley) in and Hatch's ( current) term is constitutionally ended at noon? Typically ( note typical only ) it is the longest serving senator of the majority party. It is the longest serving senator and the reason it is from the majority party is because a vote is taken and presumably the majority party has more votes to cast. Is the longest serving senator the constitutional priority? If so, Leahy would take the spot if something happened ot Grassley. This is kind of important because there have been battles back and forth about who is 3rd in line. It has changed over the years. If pence is out then Grassley steps in until a new one is voted on in both houses receiving 2/3 vote in both chambers. I think there is a plan for a power battle tomorrow at noon.

>>4570597 maybe it is a bot of jumping to conclusion but something Leahy said during the Kavanaugh hearing made the hair on the back of my neck stand up. He made a big deal about being the longest serving senator. It was the way he said it that creeped me out . I didn't know what it meant then but have since learned that he would have an arguable case to be next in line as VP with Pelosi being ahead of him unless changes made again like in the past

>>4570695 you are correct. It MUST end at noon constitution requires it but no rules for when the next starts per se. If no unanimous decision is made then by default it starts at noon on the 3rd of Jan.

Look at what Q has said about Grassley and the dates. Grassley didn't have his security detail 11/17. he got it 11/18

>>4570864

anon, they cant stay in. The constitution ends their term at noon on Jan 3rd without exceptions. They are no longer elected by the people ( House of Rep) some senators were not up for re-election 46 R's are still sworn in and 21 D's. ( note that as far as a senate goes, R's have 2/3 for the time period between 115th and 116th)

Pence opens tomorrows ceremony for the 116th Congress. My gut has been telling me for weeks now that a plan is in the works to grab power. I hope it all goes smoothly but a big part of me expects trouble