Anonymous ID: 732330 Jan. 2, 2019, 6:13 p.m. No.4572532   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2599 >>2606

>>4572494

What's more telling is to look at # of posts using the exact shill images and the date they first showed up.

Not done with my analysis, but is dumb obvious to look at those counts to spot the scrubs.

Will post in upcoming week or so when I've got some fun patterns to show.

Anonymous ID: 732330 Jan. 2, 2019, 6:21 p.m. No.4572659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2673

>>4572606

Ya, I've seen your stuff. Applaud your efforts, just don't agree at all with the Apache Software Institute tie in. Mechanically has nothing to do with it.

Simply comes down to paid rooms full of tards in their mommy's basement. On all sides of any issue.

Anonymous ID: 732330 Jan. 2, 2019, 6:27 p.m. No.4572729   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4572673

I couldn't guess, but it's not that, speaking from my codefag experience. Apache is in the business of web server platforms, not 8chan spamming kiddie script platforms.

"Bots" are anything but here. All shill activity posting wise has to be human driven/adjusted on a per bread (or captcha) basis at a minimum.