>>4571678 (lb)

Secret (Stealth?)

I wonder if Mueller & Others are actually focused on clearing out criminal judges.

The way that Flynn Sentencing hearing went, with the judge keeping asking Flynn to delay (seemed kind of frantic about it really), made me wonder if Flynn & Mueller were working together to pin the judge down to make an action. Similar to election results not being a crime until they're certified, maybe this judges crimes (if this theory is correct) would've been "locked-in" I'd he made a ruling.

Who knows, but what would an investigation/prosecution of criminal judges look like?

>>4572120

That's the most likely, based on the info we have, but then I wonder where the surprise ending would be.

We'll see.

>>4572142

>What would whistleblower case look like?

Do you know the answer? Please enlighten me. I don't know.

>>4572177

Oh. You a genius that has every detail all figured out even though we have very little information?

I would think people would want to discuss all possibilities (which you can't say it's not possible. It's only your opinion. My opinion is the same as yours, but I still look at other possibilities.).

You should do a Q & A.

>>4572455

He's Tweets ads on his Twitter. That's a bitch-move.