>>4572164 lb

Ryan adjourned until Dec. 31st under a bill to continue "discussion". He did not end the session, but continued it until the 3rd, which is the first day of the new session.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/1180

>>>You'd think they are worried about being arrested while out of session or something.

Won't they have to terminate the 2018 session in order to start the 2019 session? Have they ever continued a session into the next calendar year before?

Could we see an 'issue' develop where there is a controversy over adjourning the session and POTUS exercises his Constitutional authority to terminate the session?

>>4572987

>>4573016

>>4573078

Anon showed the Constitutional provision in an earlier bread today. When there is a controversy over adjournment, POTUS can adjourn.

There could be a controversy of they don't properly terminate the 2018 session. They are not authorized to have two simultaneous sessions.

Hell, they aren't authorized at all being impostors since 1913.