lawfag here on the renewed indictment count slide

if these were just documents they would still need to be assigned to a case and get a docket number - that is ow they appear in PACE

so if there were dupes that would be flagged in PACE

that means these are all unique filings - if these are not indictments then lawfag has no idea what they else they could be - nothing fits

yes the idea of 70,000 is staggering but not if you TRUST THE PLAN

there could easile that many and remember this is WW not just us citizens - the POTUS trafficking and corruption EO alone listed thousands of names for seized assets in a redacted list - most were foreigners

there are thousands of trusts and non profits and foundations too - each with hundreds of connections and players

adds up fast if you are REALLY cleaning house

>>4574776

plus prosecutors would name everyone whose name appeared and get them served

the old motto

round em up then sort em out

its real anons

very real

>>4574850

>>4574838

lawfag here

"documents" dont just get filed and sealed on their own - they must relate to a case - so if these were "documents" only that were related to an indictment but not an indictment they wold HAVE DUPLICATE CASES NUMBERS

THEY DO NOT - SEE PACER

CASE CLOSED

>>4574891

SOURCE IS PACER

DOCS DO NOT HAVE DUPE NUMBERS

INDPT. FILINGS

TOO MANY FOR ANY KNOWN PURPOSE EVER

THERE ARE ONLY A FEW CATEGORIES OF DOCS THAT CAN BE SEALED

JUVE RECORDS, HEALTH RECORDS AND INDICTMENTS

NOTHING ELSE THEY CAN BE

NOTHING

UNLESS YOU THINK THE GOVT IS INVESTIGATING LOTS OF JUVENILES AND SICK PEOPLE WITH HIPA RIGHTS

KEK

>>4574911

> I just don't think there are

I understand

doubting thomas i am and lawfag

it boggles the mind but there is no other rational conclusion

>>4574913

no im jewer

or jewiest

or just a quick typer with no spellcheck

or maybe i dont care as it doesnt effect the point

not writing a reference buk

>>4574961

>Shitloads of documents from any sealed case can be sealed.

lawfag here

yes this is true

in which case they would have DUPE FILING #'S FOR THE CASE

>>4574943

sorry fren

tired of repeating myself i am

>>4574969

no not other countries just us district courts

BUT many many foreign defendants will be included - MANY

>>4575003

lawfag - i answered several times

you are welcome

>>4575046

lawfag again

remember each incident or transaction or part of the conspiracy trail uncovers hundreds of persons involved and this covers years of incidents

they will all get named and brought in to see if they are usefull to move upo the chain

round em up

sort em out

>>4575077

not other countries

all US prosecutions but MANY foreign persons and companies will be included/named

MANY MANY MANY

just look at muellers list - 30 indictments 27 are foreign (estimate) and he is just a circus sideshow